‘The Malmedy Massacre: The War Crimes Trial Controversy’ by Steven P. Remy, Reviewed by John Wear

#allywarcrimes #alliedwarcrimes #kangaroocourt #worldwar2 #wwii

WEARS WAR on the Lies, Liars & WW2

      The Malmedy trial took place from May 16 to July 16, 1946, at Dachau before a military tribunal of senior American officers operating under rules established by the Nuremberg International Military Tribunal.[1] American historian Steven P. Remy has written a book titled The Malmedy Massacre which disputes that the 73 German defendants in this trial were improperly convicted.

Remy states in the conclusion to his book that American interrogators did not use physical or psychological torture to obtain information at Malmedy or any other postwar trial. Remy writes:

      There is no evidence that in the North African, European, or Pacific theaters American interrogators relied on systematic forms of physical and psychological pressure to obtain information from combatants or civilians. Nor is there convincing evidence that they did so in war crimes investigations after the war.[2]

Right:  A leading example of the use of torture to obtain…

View original post 3,274 more words

Published by

Ellie Wolfe

International supporter of NBU, follow my bitchute www.bitchute.com/fashbird2814 and on telegram t.me/blackshirtlegion

One thought on “‘The Malmedy Massacre: The War Crimes Trial Controversy’ by Steven P. Remy, Reviewed by John Wear”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.